Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 58510 for speedy trial.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 58510 for speedy trial.
State v. Gerald Kasian
reviews without deference to the trial court's ruling. See Lindas v. Cady, 183 Wis.2d 547, 552, 515 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10916 - 2005-03-31
reviews without deference to the trial court's ruling. See Lindas v. Cady, 183 Wis.2d 547, 552, 515 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10916 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. William P. Haessly
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6139 - 2017-09-19
are not prejudiced, including the right to notice, speedy trial and the opportunity to defend.” Whitaker v. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6139 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Blasing filed a pro se speedy trial demand on August 20, 2020, by which time his case had already been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
. Blasing filed a pro se speedy trial demand on August 20, 2020, by which time his case had already been
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Blasing filed a pro se speedy trial demand on August 20, 2020, by which time his case had already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
. Blasing filed a pro se speedy trial demand on August 20, 2020, by which time his case had already been
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1087931 - 2026-03-10
State v. Mark D. Goad
right in his state proceeding. With regard to the delay in charging, counsel did raise a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13049 - 2005-03-31
right in his state proceeding. With regard to the delay in charging, counsel did raise a speedy trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13049 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Goad
proceeding. With regard to the delay in charging, counsel did raise a speedy trial issue. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13049 - 2017-09-21
proceeding. With regard to the delay in charging, counsel did raise a speedy trial issue. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13049 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2)(a)1. While his cases were pending, Boozer repeatedly invoked his right to a speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
(2)(a)1. While his cases were pending, Boozer repeatedly invoked his right to a speedy trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=647477 - 2023-04-26
[PDF]
State v. Donald Williams
from trial court orders holding that there is no right to judicial substitution in Chapter 980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10833 - 2017-09-20
from trial court orders holding that there is no right to judicial substitution in Chapter 980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10833 - 2017-09-20
State v. Richard Brown
. CURLEY, J. Richard Brown and Donald Williams appeal from trial court orders holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10750 - 2005-03-31
. CURLEY, J. Richard Brown and Donald Williams appeal from trial court orders holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10750 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Richard Brown
from trial court orders holding that there is no right to judicial substitution in Chapter 980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10750 - 2017-09-20
from trial court orders holding that there is no right to judicial substitution in Chapter 980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10750 - 2017-09-20