Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 5316 for text.

[PDF] WI APP 184
begins with the statute’s text; we give the text its common, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29761 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI APP 159
of the No. 2006AP2795 7 regulation. Bar-Av, 2007 WI App 21, ¶10. We give the text its common, ordinary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29178 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Joel O. Peterson
of 6 In the footnote omitted in the text, the court further explained why it was examining
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3496 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
about serving as an adoptive resource. She stated that R.J.R. “sent a concerning text message
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=525312 - 2022-06-01

COURT OF APPEALS
not address the allegations we discuss in the text. As Clincy points out, it is undisputed that Clincy’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137236 - 2011-03-14

[PDF] Citizen's Guide to Filing an Appeal
brief, the font must have 10 characters per inch, the text must be double-spaced, with 1.5 inch margin
/ca/citizen/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27729 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
understood in the context of evidence from Johnson and Tyler’s statements noted in the text. The following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=423085 - 2021-09-09

[PDF] WI App 4
that the circuit court was correct. According to Ricketts, the statutory text is unambiguous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1048314 - 2026-02-10

Frontsheet
, 298 Wis. 2d 534, ¶15. The court of appeals held that the plain text of Wis. Stat. § 19.85 "clearly
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33385 - 2008-07-10

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
not stop. It ended when Sally received a text message that Becky was coming back to get them.3 ¶4 When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875219 - 2024-11-12