Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 50083 for writ of certiorari forms.
Search results 1061 - 1070 of 50083 for writ of certiorari forms.
State v. Kenneth G. Gering
is initiated by writ of certiorari, not a motion to modify the sentence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10201 - 2005-03-31
is initiated by writ of certiorari, not a motion to modify the sentence. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10201 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
William N. Ledford v. Dan Buchler
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari. The issue is whether his due process hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8182 - 2017-09-19
dismissing his petition for a writ of certiorari. The issue is whether his due process hearing was held
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8182 - 2017-09-19
Lawrence Pieczynski v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
the grounds for review, the department’s decision is reviewed by common law writ of certiorari. See Berschens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14753 - 2005-03-31
the grounds for review, the department’s decision is reviewed by common law writ of certiorari. See Berschens
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14753 - 2005-03-31
Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
certiorari review of BOZA’s initial decision. On August 6, 2001, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Elsa C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31
certiorari review of BOZA’s initial decision. On August 6, 2001, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Elsa C
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5003 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Hearst-Argyle Stations, Inc. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Milwaukee
certiorari review of BOZA’s initial decision. On August 6, 2001, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19
certiorari review of BOZA’s initial decision. On August 6, 2001, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5003 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of certiorari. Krebs seeks review of the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11402 - 2017-09-19
the trial court’s order denying his petition for writ of certiorari. Krebs seeks review of the Division
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11402 - 2017-09-19
Kenneth Krebs v. David H. Schwarz
denying his petition for writ of certiorari. Krebs seeks review of the Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31
denying his petition for writ of certiorari. Krebs seeks review of the Division of Hearings and Appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11402 - 2005-03-31
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against Elections Board). Article VII, § 5(3) of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against Elections Board). Article VII, § 5(3) of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12531 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Michael Younglove v. City of Oak Creek Fire and Police Commission
) (court of appeals does not have original jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against Elections Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12531 - 2017-09-21
) (court of appeals does not have original jurisdiction to issue writ of mandamus against Elections Board
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12531 - 2017-09-21
James Antisdel v. City of Oak Creek Police and Fire Commission
pursuant to the writ of certiorari is limited to whether the Board: (1) acted within its jurisdiction; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31
pursuant to the writ of certiorari is limited to whether the Board: (1) acted within its jurisdiction; (2
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17340 - 2005-03-31