Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 63789 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
Kimberly S. S. v. Sebastian X. L.
these statutory warnings. The circuit court granted Sebastian’s motion and Kimberly appeals. The chief judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7678 - 2017-09-19
these statutory warnings. The circuit court granted Sebastian’s motion and Kimberly appeals. The chief judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7678 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
corpus and ordered Jensen “released from custody unless, within 90 days of the date of this decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26
corpus and ordered Jensen “released from custody unless, within 90 days of the date of this decision
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=254948 - 2020-02-26
[PDF]
WI APP 30
and an order denying his postconviction motion. VanDyke argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136351 - 2017-09-21
and an order denying his postconviction motion. VanDyke argues his trial counsel rendered ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=136351 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for resentencing. Bokenyi argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98153 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for resentencing. Bokenyi argues the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98153 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying his motion for resentencing. Bokenyi argues the State breached the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98153 - 2013-06-17
of conviction and an order denying his motion for resentencing. Bokenyi argues the State breached the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98153 - 2013-06-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Background ¶2 C.H.’s mother, R.J.M., who has custody of C.H., petitioned for the termination of M.R.H.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
. Background ¶2 C.H.’s mother, R.J.M., who has custody of C.H., petitioned for the termination of M.R.H.’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=175102 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Russell L. Dawber
consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5 On June 26, 2001, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5462 - 2017-09-19
consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5 On June 26, 2001, the State filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5462 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs for a frivolous appeal, while we are unsure whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs for a frivolous appeal, while we are unsure whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11298 - 2017-09-19
Steven Woerpel v. Reg Gill
. We see no error in the trial court’s coverage ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11298 - 2005-03-31
. We see no error in the trial court’s coverage ruling. As to American Family’s motion for costs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11298 - 2005-03-31
State v. Russell L. Dawber
on each of those, and sentenced Dawber consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31
on each of those, and sentenced Dawber consistent with the parties’ joint recommendation. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5462 - 2005-03-31