Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 82603 for order for a biological sample for drug testing.

[PDF] State of the Judiciary Address 2020
protocols for drug/alcohol testing, behavior responses to violations, and incentivizing participants
/publications/speeches/docs/judaddress20.pdf - 2020-11-05

State v. Kevin J. Van Riper
under the law of another jurisdiction that prohibits refusal of chemical testing or use of a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6154 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
with the aforementioned felony, as well as two misdemeanors: possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99398 - 2013-07-15

[PDF] State v. Kevin J. Van Riper
was originally a one-judge appeal; it was converted to a three-judge panel by order of the Chief Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6154 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with the aforementioned felony, as well as two misdemeanors: possession of cocaine and possession of drug paraphernalia
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=99398 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the following opinion and order: 2020AP1145-CRNM 2020AP1146-CRNM 2020AP1147-CRNM State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=420754 - 2021-09-08

State v. Jerald J. McDowell
for drug-related offenses and postconviction orders denying motions to withdraw his pleas. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10604 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jerald J. McDowell
for drug-related offenses and postconviction orders denying motions to withdraw his pleas. The state
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10593 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231720 - 2019-01-09

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 18, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and drug treatment with the Veteran’s Administration. In compliance with the trial court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26834 - 2006-10-17