Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 16073 for probate.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 16073 for probate.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ probation. The no-merit report addresses potential issues regarding suppression of evidence; jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
’ probation. The no-merit report addresses potential issues regarding suppression of evidence; jury
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=256287 - 2020-03-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17
of extended supervision. On the second charge, it ordered a consecutive period of probation. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=825163 - 2024-07-17
[PDF]
NOTICE
of probation. ¶3 On appeal, Hughes challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. His principal challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29780 - 2014-09-15
of probation. ¶3 On appeal, Hughes challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. His principal challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29780 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
in jail, imposed and stayed, with two years of probation and sixty days of conditional jail time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131189 - 2014-12-01
in jail, imposed and stayed, with two years of probation and sixty days of conditional jail time
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131189 - 2014-12-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of extended supervision, and a three- year term of probation. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04
of extended supervision, and a three- year term of probation. The no-merit report addresses whether
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=604120 - 2023-01-04
CA Blank Order
day of each period when he was detained on a probation hold. The respondent does not dispute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134426 - 2015-02-02
day of each period when he was detained on a probation hold. The respondent does not dispute
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134426 - 2015-02-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the State would recommend probation. At sentencing, the court imposed 17 years of initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129962 - 2026-06-11
that the State would recommend probation. At sentencing, the court imposed 17 years of initial confinement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1129962 - 2026-06-11
CA Blank Order
had mortally, if accidentally, injured. The court explained why it could not order probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97572 - 2013-06-04
had mortally, if accidentally, injured. The court explained why it could not order probation
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97572 - 2013-06-04
CA Blank Order
or probation revocation. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2000 WI 86, ¶28, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
or probation revocation. See State ex rel. Cramer v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 2000 WI 86, ¶28, 236 Wis. 2d
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=116632 - 2014-07-08
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Langston
to consecutive terms totaling fifty-five years in prison to be followed by ten years probation. Nos. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11318 - 2017-09-19
to consecutive terms totaling fifty-five years in prison to be followed by ten years probation. Nos. 96
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11318 - 2017-09-19