Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 63198 for records.
Search results 10601 - 10610 of 63198 for records.
State v. Darrell T. Dalton
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
that he could respond to the report, but he has not done so. After an independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10618 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
to remove an operating-while-under-the-influence-of-an-intoxicant offense (“OWI”) from his record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
to remove an operating-while-under-the-influence-of-an-intoxicant offense (“OWI”) from his record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70217 - 2011-08-29
State v. Patrick C. Webster
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13369 - 2005-03-31
hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin Criminal Investigation Bureau (WCIB) showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13369 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94908 - 2013-03-31
a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94908 - 2013-03-31
Chris J. Jacobs v. Gary R. McCaughtry
misconduct. ¶8 The record fails to support Jacobs’ allegation that Muraski issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6259 - 2005-03-31
misconduct. ¶8 The record fails to support Jacobs’ allegation that Muraski issued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233558 - 2019-01-24
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233558 - 2019-01-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104474 - 2013-11-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10956 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19
). In addition, the court must consider the defendant’s criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10955 - 2017-09-19