Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10611 - 10620 of 58518 for o j.
Search results 10611 - 10620 of 58518 for o j.
[PDF]
State v. Vernon H. Walker
4 The September 30, 1996 docket entry is, “[o]n stipulation of counsel, Court adjourn[]s Jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
4 The September 30, 1996 docket entry is, “[o]n stipulation of counsel, Court adjourn[]s Jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25837 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Rock Prairie c/o Melvin Graham-Jackson 2002 Dunn Place Madison, WI 53713 You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
Rock Prairie c/o Melvin Graham-Jackson 2002 Dunn Place Madison, WI 53713 You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1007064 - 2025-09-11
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that police contacts with Kingsley have resulted in a department-wide response based on “[o]fficer safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
that police contacts with Kingsley have resulted in a department-wide response based on “[o]fficer safety
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=250652 - 2019-11-27
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
Leonard L. Jones v. State
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion, she moved “for an [o]rder to reclassify above [f]elony Class C under [2001 Wis.] Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64465 - 2014-09-15
postconviction motion, she moved “for an [o]rder to reclassify above [f]elony Class C under [2001 Wis.] Act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64465 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Daniel Harr v. Daniel Bertrand
Constitution states: “[N]o person for the same offense may be put twice in jeopardy of punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4267 - 2017-09-19
Constitution states: “[N]o person for the same offense may be put twice in jeopardy of punishment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4267 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at 209. “[T]o justify a particular intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266938 - 2020-07-07
at 209. “[T]o justify a particular intrusion, ‘the police officer must be able to point to specific
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=266938 - 2020-07-07