Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10611 - 10620 of 56379 for so.

COURT OF APPEALS
with a five-paragraph email, conciliatory in tone, which included the following: So, depending on how you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63617 - 2011-05-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
here. And the threats do appear to be linked to her cooperating with law enforcement. So I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909669 - 2025-02-05

[PDF] NOTICE
that the sentence imposed was unduly harsh or excessive, is whether “the sentence is so excessive and unusual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27113 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
mandatory DNA surcharges, so we modify the judgment of conviction as described herein and, as modified, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=147197 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
. Your attitude is pretty cavalier at this point, and that is, well, I absconded for 10 months so I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55650 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Gary M. Kratochwill
to do so. Therefore, the evidence obtained was properly admitted and accordingly, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16065 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
…. …. So having a warning sign would have done nothing to prevent this injury because the plaintiff
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103820 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Andrew D. Wielunski
occurred July 17, 1996, and July 19, 1997. Because the parties rely on the 1995-96 statutes, so does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14794 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Bruce H. Manke
. And, citing Geraldson, supra, he says that Reimer’s failure to do so warrants reversal. No. 99-2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15815 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
find an erroneous exercise of sentencing discretion “only where the sentence is so excessive
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=226613 - 2018-11-14