Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10611 - 10620 of 58506 for speedy trial.

Marion Steinberg v. Thomas R. Jensen
and cause remanded for a new trial. Before Wedemeyer, P.J., Sullivan and Fine, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7684 - 2005-03-31

State v. Miguel Angel Santana-Lopez
, see Wis. Stat. § 948.02(1).[1] He claims that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15279 - 2009-10-27

Dawn Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it found that a change in case law did not justify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2011-12 version. No. 2011AP1249 2 for a new trial and his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98380 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Dawn Sukala v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
. No. 03-0173 2 assert that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6078 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
Schindler contends the trial court erred in denying its motion to dismiss, which alleged that GM had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=64000 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Steve Yang
that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance when the lawyer failed to: (1) impeach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6528 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction and an order denying postconviction relief. Following a jury trial, Tobar was convicted of two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=307090 - 2020-11-24

Cushman Enterprises, Inc. v. New Holland of North America, Inc.
., and one of its employees. Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred when it granted New Holland’s summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12677 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Cushman Enterprises, Inc. v. New Holland of North America, Inc.
employees. Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred when it granted New Holland’s summary judgment motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12677 - 2017-09-21