Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 28716 for f.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 28716 for f.
CA Blank Order
exercises its discretion in determining if a new factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶37. “[I]f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93296 - 2013-02-21
exercises its discretion in determining if a new factor justifies sentence modification. Id., ¶37. “[I]f
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93296 - 2013-02-21
COURT OF APPEALS
)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39571 - 2009-08-18
)(f) (2007-08). All references to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2007-08 version unless otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39571 - 2009-08-18
CA Blank Order
would dissipate, however, “[i]f an officer comes upon information suggesting that the assumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
would dissipate, however, “[i]f an officer comes upon information suggesting that the assumption
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102036 - 2013-09-15
WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS OFFICE OF THE CLERK Telephone: 608-266-1880 110 E. Main Street, Suite 215...
2014AP002495 Kay & Kay Law Firm v. Robert C. Stangler 2014AP002604 CR State v. Jeffrey F. Smart 2014AP002619
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143656 - 2015-07-12
2014AP002495 Kay & Kay Law Firm v. Robert C. Stangler 2014AP002604 CR State v. Jeffrey F. Smart 2014AP002619
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143656 - 2015-07-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253606 - 2020-02-05
This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2017-18). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253606 - 2020-02-05
State v. Michael G. Ehlers
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8897 - 2005-03-31
)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2)(f), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8897 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In support, Nelson relies on United States v. Cohen, 481 F.3d 896
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
reasonable suspicion to stop his vehicle. In support, Nelson relies on United States v. Cohen, 481 F.3d 896
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88591 - 2012-10-22
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
State v. Alphonso Lamont Willis1 10-06-2020 Affirmed 2018AP001109 State v. Thomas F. Glass, Jr.1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313183 - 2020-12-08
State v. Alphonso Lamont Willis1 10-06-2020 Affirmed 2018AP001109 State v. Thomas F. Glass, Jr.1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=313183 - 2020-12-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
4 App 163, ¶7, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878. “[I]f an inmate cannot prove a protected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97993 - 2014-09-15
4 App 163, ¶7, 246 Wis. 2d 814, 632 N.W.2d 878. “[I]f an inmate cannot prove a protected
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97993 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. David W. Throm
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7589 - 2017-09-19
and an order of the circuit court for Jefferson County: WILLIAM F. HUE, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7589 - 2017-09-19