Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 39058 for probate forms.
Search results 10621 - 10630 of 39058 for probate forms.
2008 WI APP 7
to exercise probate jurisdiction.” In Knight, the court noted that “for purposes of § 879.27(1),” this means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31012 - 2008-01-29
to exercise probate jurisdiction.” In Knight, the court noted that “for purposes of § 879.27(1),” this means
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31012 - 2008-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
offender and was placed on probation. In 2001, following the revocation of Obriecht’s probation, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
offender and was placed on probation. In 2001, following the revocation of Obriecht’s probation, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
Cory W. Hussey v. Outagamie County
the probation period. Id. at 502, 311 N.W.2d at 648. In Kaiser, the court reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9877 - 2005-03-31
the probation period. Id. at 502, 311 N.W.2d at 648. In Kaiser, the court reasoned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9877 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Frontsheet
would recommend two years of probation, conditioned upon participation in and completion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237653 - 2019-03-19
would recommend two years of probation, conditioned upon participation in and completion
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=237653 - 2019-03-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on a probation hold without work release privileges. The motion alleges that, because he was not in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
on a probation hold without work release privileges. The motion alleges that, because he was not in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135724 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
WI APP 163
imprisonment and was placed on probation for a period of five years, beginning July 2002. In May 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
imprisonment and was placed on probation for a period of five years, beginning July 2002. In May 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34240 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
entered a no-contest plea to battery as a habitual offender and was placed on probation. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
entered a no-contest plea to battery as a habitual offender and was placed on probation. In 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
State v. Henry A. Phillips
' probation. Before sentencing, the court engaged in the following colloquy with Phillips: THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
' probation. Before sentencing, the court engaged in the following colloquy with Phillips: THE COURT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
State v. Anthony Murphy
allow counsel to confirm with Singer that she was in custody on a probation hold, that she has used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4149 - 2005-03-31
allow counsel to confirm with Singer that she was in custody on a probation hold, that she has used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
decision. No. 2022AP155 5 “Review of parole and probation revocation decisions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14
decision. No. 2022AP155 5 “Review of parole and probation revocation decisions
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=622248 - 2023-02-14