Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10631 - 10640 of 17584 for ex.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
(1997). “[S]tatutory interpretation begins with the language of the statute.” State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=782919 - 2024-04-02

State v. Stuart D. Yates
is a discretionary decision for the circuit court. See State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d 615, 635, 579
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15674 - 2005-03-31

2006 WI APP 222
. Tumm, 2000 WI App 160, ¶7, 237 Wis. 2d 752, 615 N.W.2d 187 (citing State ex rel. Young v. Maresch, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26404 - 2006-10-30

Certification
of the legislature’s rules of proceeding. State ex rel. LaFollette v. Stitt, 114 Wis. 2d 358, 367-68, 338 N.W.2d 684
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33101 - 2008-10-09

[PDF] WI APP 125
or constitutional infirmity, we apply statutes as they are written. State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court, 2004 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28539 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Jeanette Schwarzbach v. Steve Thelen
to be Reese’s ex-husband. The ski hill was in financial trouble and it was anticipated that with an ownership
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4605 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
of the damaged hymen. Through the testimony of his ex-wife and later through his own testimony, he sought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26973 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
was ineffective for failing to challenge the validity of his guilty and no-contest pleas. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44849 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
to counsel in a postconviction proceeding under § 974.06, see State ex rel. Warren v. Schwarz, 219 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19

Karen R. Yocherer v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
. ¶12 The court of appeals was intended as a high-volume, error-correcting court. State ex
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2471 - 2005-03-31