Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10631 - 10640 of 63198 for records.
Search results 10631 - 10640 of 63198 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253402 - 2020-02-05
not done so. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=253402 - 2020-02-05
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99149 - 2013-07-09
review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment because
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99149 - 2013-07-09
[PDF]
Brandon Hill v. Patricia A. Butler
portion of the record that explains the facts of this case is the sparse pleadings filed in small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
portion of the record that explains the facts of this case is the sparse pleadings filed in small claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6362 - 2017-09-19
State v. Joseph C. Reinsbach
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2017AP831-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03
. No. 2017AP831-CRNM 2 independent review of the record, we conclude that there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210727 - 2018-04-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132592 - 2017-09-21
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132592 - 2017-09-21
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238782 - 2019-04-09
to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=238782 - 2019-04-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09
809.21. After our independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=251185 - 2019-12-09