Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10631 - 10640 of 63710 for records.
Search results 10631 - 10640 of 63710 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
the Record, counsel’s report, and Albrecht’s response, we conclude there are no issues with arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=854766 - 2024-10-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080520 - 2026-02-25
right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record and counsel’s report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1080520 - 2026-02-25
State v. Terry Lee Paul
record and progress are not new factors justifying sentence modification, but are matters that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12585 - 2005-03-31
record and progress are not new factors justifying sentence modification, but are matters that should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12585 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Debra Schultz v. Daniel P. Schultz
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No(s). 99-0668-FT 2 that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15245 - 2017-09-21
This is an expedited appeal under RULE 809.17, STATS. No(s). 99-0668-FT 2 that the record does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15245 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CRNM 2 Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772113 - 2024-03-05
-CRNM 2 Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=772113 - 2024-03-05
State v. Joseph C. Reinsbach
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
so. After considering the no-merit report and conducting an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106859 - 2014-01-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
- No. 2006AP2643 3 06),1 so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31746 - 2014-09-15
- No. 2006AP2643 3 06),1 so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31746 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233558 - 2019-01-24
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report as mandated by Anders. We
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=233558 - 2019-01-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15