Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10641 - 10650 of 63559 for records.
Search results 10641 - 10650 of 63559 for records.
[PDF]
State v. Terry Lee Paul
that his exemplary conduct in the prison constitutes a new factor. A defendant’s prison record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12585 - 2017-09-21
that his exemplary conduct in the prison constitutes a new factor. A defendant’s prison record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12585 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479281 - 2022-02-01
has not responded. Upon our independent review of the records as mandated by Anders v. California
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=479281 - 2022-02-01
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to waive the costs of preparing a transcript. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
to waive the costs of preparing a transcript. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=195278 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Scott Peterson
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
the Petitioner directly or indirectly upon the record to justify their individual acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15154 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
characterizes as an error in computation that is not supported by the evidentiary record. We reject Carl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31141 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Steven J. Zack
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15873 - 2017-09-21
exercised its discretion when sentencing Steven Zack. Because the records show that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15873 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
City of Sheboygan Falls v. James B. Hodgell
of the record that are before us. See Jocius v. Jocius, 218 Wis. 2d 103, 119, 580 N.W.2d 708 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25347 - 2017-09-21
of the record that are before us. See Jocius v. Jocius, 218 Wis. 2d 103, 119, 580 N.W.2d 708 (Ct. App. 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25347 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15
of the report and our independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212718 - 2018-05-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15
right to file a response. She has not done so. Upon an independent review of the Record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1024098 - 2025-10-15