Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10651 - 10660 of 77620 for search which.
Search results 10651 - 10660 of 77620 for search which.
State v. Stuart M. Buzzell
perform field sobriety tests and asked him to submit to a preliminary breath test, which showed .08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
perform field sobriety tests and asked him to submit to a preliminary breath test, which showed .08
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3494 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
discretion, this court will “search the record to determine whether in the exercise of proper discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20800 - 2017-09-21
discretion, this court will “search the record to determine whether in the exercise of proper discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20800 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his detention. The circuit court denied Vogt’s motion following an evidentiary hearing at which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
of his detention. The circuit court denied Vogt’s motion following an evidentiary hearing at which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94141 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
separate times over a period of three days about an armed robbery during which Sharon Staples was killed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111828 - 2014-05-12
separate times over a period of three days about an armed robbery during which Sharon Staples was killed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111828 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
City of Madison v. Timothy J. Duffy
principles to the facts as found is a question of law which we decide without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16077 - 2017-09-21
principles to the facts as found is a question of law which we decide without deference to the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16077 - 2017-09-21
Rustam Gallery Oriental Rugs v. Christine Lindemann
” is not a specific ground for excluding evidence.[3] Testimony or exhibits, which result in surprise, may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5638 - 2013-08-19
” is not a specific ground for excluding evidence.[3] Testimony or exhibits, which result in surprise, may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5638 - 2013-08-19
COURT OF APPEALS
following an evidentiary hearing at which only Small testified. The court observed that “this is a close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2005-03-13
following an evidentiary hearing at which only Small testified. The court observed that “this is a close
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94141 - 2005-03-13
COURT OF APPEALS
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35548 - 2005-02-16
, 662, 158 N.W.2d 318 (1968). “[W]e may search the record to determine if it supports the court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35548 - 2005-02-16
[PDF]
Petition for Rule-Making
of a then-existing discovery request, subpoena, preservation order, public records request, or search warrant
/supreme/docs/1405petition.pdf - 2014-11-12
of a then-existing discovery request, subpoena, preservation order, public records request, or search warrant
/supreme/docs/1405petition.pdf - 2014-11-12
State v. James A. Munsch
concentration. On appeal, he contends that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15768 - 2005-03-31
concentration. On appeal, he contends that the blood draw was an “unreasonable” search and seizure because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15768 - 2005-03-31