Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10661 - 10670 of 63304 for Motion for joint custody.

Frontsheet
motion to dismiss. The UWHCA asserted that Rouse failed to serve the notice of claim required by Wis
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29622 - 2007-07-05

Frontsheet
Commission on its motion, concluding that Wis. Admin. Code ch. PSC 128 does not directly or substantially
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143759 - 2015-06-29

[PDF] Frontsheet
The circuit court granted summary judgment to the Public Service Commission on its motion, concluding
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143759 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
in the circuit court in which there were numerous contested issues relating to legal custody and physical
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244168 - 2019-07-25

Rock County Department of Human Services v. Rodney W.
due process. He also contends the court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18488 - 2005-06-08

[PDF] State v. Thomas L. Seeley
sentence, and an order denying his postconviction motions. He claims that: (1) the prosecutor committed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11076 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12675 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
entered after the trial court denied his motion to suppress evidence seized during the execution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32109 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Shane M. Ferguson
Ferguson argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion. He contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2112 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County Department of Human Services v. Kim A. S.
erroneously exercised its discretion by denying his motion to suppress a videotape; (2) the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12674 - 2017-09-21