Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10661 - 10670 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 10661 - 10670 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
warrantless search. The State opposed the motion, arguing that the officers lawfully entered Stewart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
warrantless search. The State opposed the motion, arguing that the officers lawfully entered Stewart’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158221 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the vehicle parked in the driveway, and made contact with Tarkenton. The officers had been searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
the vehicle parked in the driveway, and made contact with Tarkenton. The officers had been searching
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=663723 - 2023-06-02
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - September 2015
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER 2015 The cases scheduled
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148243 - 2017-09-21
WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT CALENDAR AND CASE SYNOPSES SEPTEMBER 2015 The cases scheduled
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148243 - 2017-09-21
State v. Christopher M. Repenshek
explained that one question in the case was “whether the standard for drawing a blood sample in a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7052 - 2005-03-31
explained that one question in the case was “whether the standard for drawing a blood sample in a search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7052 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Christopher M. Repenshek
2004 WI App 229 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3089-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7052 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 229 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-3089-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7052 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
determined that the conviction counts as a prior offense in this case. The effect of the court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515012 - 2022-04-28
determined that the conviction counts as a prior offense in this case. The effect of the court’s order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=515012 - 2022-04-28
[PDF]
WI APP 59
2009 WI APP 59 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP2941-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36091 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 59 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2007AP2941-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36091 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and presided over the trial in this case. The Honorable Kevin E. Martens entered the judgment following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305194 - 2020-11-17
, and presided over the trial in this case. The Honorable Kevin E. Martens entered the judgment following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=305194 - 2020-11-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to cross-examine Mojica, the court excused Mojica as a witness, and Wright Weber rested its case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146953 - 2017-09-21
to cross-examine Mojica, the court excused Mojica as a witness, and Wright Weber rested its case. ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=146953 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
parcel would be acquired in fee simple. ¶7 DSG moved for reconsideration, arguing that the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36258 - 2014-09-15
parcel would be acquired in fee simple. ¶7 DSG moved for reconsideration, arguing that the amended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36258 - 2014-09-15