Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 58195 for o j.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 58195 for o j.
[PDF]
State v. Kerry R.
review by this court. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26315 - 2017-09-21
review by this court. State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶6, 233 Wis. 2d 663, 607 N.W.2d 927. ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26315 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
]o justify an investigatory stop, the police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
]o justify an investigatory stop, the police must have a reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35197 - 2009-01-12
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Debra J.A.
. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶5, Nos. 99-2485, 99-2486, 99-2487. A trial court’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2190 - 2005-03-31
. See State v. April O., 2000 WI App 70, ¶5, Nos. 99-2485, 99-2486, 99-2487. A trial court’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2190 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
id. at 215 (explaining that “[n]o expert was prepared to say that [the victim] would have died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219525 - 2018-09-20
id. at 215 (explaining that “[n]o expert was prepared to say that [the victim] would have died
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219525 - 2018-09-20
Mark Johnson (Deceased) v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
(Deceased), c/o Theresa Johnson-Buhrandt, Plaintiff-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31
(Deceased), c/o Theresa Johnson-Buhrandt, Plaintiff-Appellant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13012 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
the charges against him. The trial court reviewed the proffered evidence and ruled in pertinent part: [T]o
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15525 - 2005-03-31
Leonard L. Jones v. State
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that “privates” meant where she went “[t]o the bathroom,” and that he touched her where she went “[p]ee.” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-28
that “privates” meant where she went “[t]o the bathroom,” and that he touched her where she went “[p]ee.” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2011-11-28
State v. Kionta L. Crockett
] to this case. Is it worthy of something more o[r] some further consideration? [The trial court has] decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12
] to this case. Is it worthy of something more o[r] some further consideration? [The trial court has] decided
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20603 - 2005-12-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Distrib. Corp. v. O & R Engines, Inc., 71 Wis. 2d 792, 795- 96, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96546 - 2014-09-15
Distrib. Corp. v. O & R Engines, Inc., 71 Wis. 2d 792, 795- 96, 239 N.W.2d 97 (1976
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=96546 - 2014-09-15