Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 91256 for police arresting judge 2 part.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 91256 for police arresting judge 2 part.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
COUNTY: Kenosha JUDGE: Bruce E. Schroeder JUSTICES: ROGGENSACK, J., announced the mandate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625344 - 2023-03-20
COUNTY: Kenosha JUDGE: Bruce E. Schroeder JUSTICES: ROGGENSACK, J., announced the mandate
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=625344 - 2023-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2015-16). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232688 - 2019-01-25
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2) (2015-16). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=232688 - 2019-01-25
[PDF]
State v. Loren C. Alliet
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7179 - 2017-09-20
and an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: ELSA C. LAMELAS, Judge. Affirmed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7179 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective assistance by advising him not to testify; (2) one of the arresting law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1144829 - 2026-07-14
ineffective assistance by advising him not to testify; (2) one of the arresting law enforcement officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1144829 - 2026-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
ineffective assistance by advising him not to testify; (2) one of the arresting law enforcement officers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1144829 - 2026-07-14
ineffective assistance by advising him not to testify; (2) one of the arresting law enforcement officers
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1144829 - 2026-07-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875224 - 2024-11-12
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875224 - 2024-11-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875224 - 2024-11-12
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(f) (2021-22). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=875224 - 2024-11-12
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Glamann
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19156 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2). All references
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19156 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ronald S. Severson
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11866 - 2005-03-31
Rule 809.23(1)(b)4, Stats. [1] This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to § 752.31(2), Stats.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11866 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jamie D. Jardine
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9321 - 2017-09-19
. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Douglas County: MICHAEL T. LUCCI, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9321 - 2017-09-19