Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 63577 for records.
Search results 10671 - 10680 of 63577 for records.
State v. Steven Warner
) whether the trial court improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31
) whether the trial court improperly limited Warner's access to his victim's medical records; (2) whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7953 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
Order-SC
to move for reconsideration expired on August 20, 2014, see § (Rule) 809.64, Stats., and the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125237 - 2014-10-21
to move for reconsideration expired on August 20, 2014, see § (Rule) 809.64, Stats., and the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125237 - 2014-10-21
Brandon Hill v. Patricia A. Butler
court’s findings of fact, we affirm. ¶2 The only portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6362 - 2005-03-31
court’s findings of fact, we affirm. ¶2 The only portion of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6362 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499711 - 2022-03-29
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=499711 - 2022-03-29
CA Blank Order
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109332 - 2014-03-18
record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no arguably meritorious appellate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109332 - 2014-03-18
State v. Dennis R. Armstrong
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
criminal record, his attitude and demeanor, and whether he shows remorse. Id. (citation omitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10955 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of his right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011573 - 2025-09-23
of his right to file a response, and has not responded. We have independently reviewed the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011573 - 2025-09-23
COURT OF APPEALS
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
CA Blank Order
. Hough was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133790 - 2015-01-25
. Hough was sent a copy of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133790 - 2015-01-25