Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10681 - 10690 of 68758 for had.

[PDF] State v. John E. Stephens
., and by the double jeopardy clause of the United States Constitution, because he had "previously been prosecuted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9457 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Dwayne G. Thomas v. David M. Schwarz
of Hearings and Appeals (Division) had properly revoked Thomas’s probation. Thomas’s probation was revoked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18649 - 2017-09-21

State v. Jonathan J. English-Lancaster
, trial defense counsel conceded that the State had not indicated that it would be introducing other acts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4023 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] FICE OF THE CLERK
had slurred speech, and that Dragisich appeared tired. Dragisich was also unable to successfully
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92620 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] WI App 7
of this termination of parental rights (TPR) action, the parties stipulated R.I. had abandoned M.J. However, R.I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206438 - 2018-02-12

[PDF] Menard, Inc. v. Liteway Lighting Products
litigated in a previous suit and that Menard’s suit was not precluded because it had not been required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6517 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
with a person the witness knew as “Chan.” Apparently “Chan” had parked a car, which Saddler thought
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30754 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Justin R. Baumann
for a hearing under State v. Becker, 74 Wis. 2d 675, 247 N.W.2d 495 (1976), “at which the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7065 - 2017-09-20

COURT OF APPEALS
that in 2008 Gardner had a sexual relationship with a child under the age of sixteen, Gardner was charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89960 - 2012-12-04

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
presented to the warrant-issuing magistrate to determine whether he or she “had a substantial basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=192300 - 2017-09-21