Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 17421 for Cost.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 17421 for Cost.
[PDF]
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT,
CV-443, 05/19 Notice to Department of Corrections of Actual Filing Fees and Costs §814.29(1m)(c
/formdisplay/CV-443.pdf?formNumber=CV-443&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-10-25
CV-443, 05/19 Notice to Department of Corrections of Actual Filing Fees and Costs §814.29(1m)(c
/formdisplay/CV-443.pdf?formNumber=CV-443&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2019-10-25
[PDF]
Wisconsin State Courts
. The Order for Reimbursement for Costs of Representation is revised to require no reimbursement. B
/formdisplay/ME-933.pdf?formNumber=ME-933&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-03-18
. The Order for Reimbursement for Costs of Representation is revised to require no reimbursement. B
/formdisplay/ME-933.pdf?formNumber=ME-933&formType=Form&formatId=2&language=en - 2021-03-18
[PDF]
WI 24
to SCR 22.17(2).1 Costs 1 SCR 22.17(2) states
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94388 - 2014-09-15
to SCR 22.17(2).1 Costs 1 SCR 22.17(2) states
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94388 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Lickety Split Drive-In, Inc. v. American States Insurance Company
Company and awarding American No. 02-3008 2 costs. The final judgment incorporated the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5880 - 2017-09-19
Company and awarding American No. 02-3008 2 costs. The final judgment incorporated the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5880 - 2017-09-19
Lickety Split Drive-In, Inc. v. American States Insurance Company
American costs. The final judgment incorporated the trial court’s two earlier summary judgments. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5880 - 2005-03-31
American costs. The final judgment incorporated the trial court’s two earlier summary judgments. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5880 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
proceeds pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Costs totaling $40,960.49 as of August 6, 2012, are disputed.[2] We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94388 - 2013-03-24
proceeds pursuant to SCR 22.17(2).[1] Costs totaling $40,960.49 as of August 6, 2012, are disputed.[2] We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94388 - 2013-03-24
[PDF]
Timothy A. Pachowitz v. Katherina R. LeDoux
of settlement valid and therefore awarding Pachowitz double costs and interest pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5534 - 2017-09-19
of settlement valid and therefore awarding Pachowitz double costs and interest pursuant to WIS. STAT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5534 - 2017-09-19
Timothy A. Pachowitz v. Katherina R. LeDoux
of settlement valid and therefore awarding Pachowitz double costs and interest pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5534 - 2005-03-31
of settlement valid and therefore awarding Pachowitz double costs and interest pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 807.01(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5534 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
submitted her petition for legal fees and costs pursuant to the fee-shifting provisions of the civil theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812303 - 2024-06-11
submitted her petition for legal fees and costs pursuant to the fee-shifting provisions of the civil theft
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=812303 - 2024-06-11
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a January 2006 judgment and order which required her to pay costs to the City of Janesville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29588 - 2007-07-04
appeals a January 2006 judgment and order which required her to pay costs to the City of Janesville
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29588 - 2007-07-04