Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 29966 for de.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 29966 for de.
Bud Meyer v. Racine County
of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6097 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment is de novo, and we use the same methodology as the circuit court. M & I First Nat’l Bank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6097 - 2005-03-31
Helen L. Rogers v. Rexford G. Grunewald
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6282 - 2005-03-31
-Appellant. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane County: Robert De
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6282 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
review de novo. See generally Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231938 - 2019-01-15
review de novo. See generally Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231938 - 2019-01-15
State v. Dale H. Krause
that the appellate issue¾whether he is entitled to a full resentencing¾is an issue of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
that the appellate issue¾whether he is entitled to a full resentencing¾is an issue of law that this court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15958 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
District II June 10, 2015 To: Hon. Linda M. Van De Water Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142800 - 2015-06-09
District II June 10, 2015 To: Hon. Linda M. Van De Water Circuit Court Judge Waukesha County
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142800 - 2015-06-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
jurisdiction.2 See State v. Schroeder, 224 Wis. 2d 706, 711, 593 N.W.2d 76 (Ct. App. 1999). We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601655 - 2022-12-21
jurisdiction.2 See State v. Schroeder, 224 Wis. 2d 706, 711, 593 N.W.2d 76 (Ct. App. 1999). We review de
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=601655 - 2022-12-21
COURT OF APPEALS
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105378 - 2013-12-10
At a trial de novo, the circuit court found that Village Storage and Erdmann had orally modified the written
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105378 - 2013-12-10
State v. Curtiss J. Swoboda
a litigant's constitutional right to present a defense, however, we review the matter de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
a litigant's constitutional right to present a defense, however, we review the matter de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8274 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Jerry Person v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
the supporting facts; (2) the Commission’s decision should be reviewed de novo; (3) the Commission failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7213 - 2017-09-20
the supporting facts; (2) the Commission’s decision should be reviewed de novo; (3) the Commission failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7213 - 2017-09-20
John E. Pickel v. John Harr, Jr.
deferred her taxation on a de facto basis. That de facto deferral “adjourned the taxation” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31
deferred her taxation on a de facto basis. That de facto deferral “adjourned the taxation” within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11831 - 2005-03-31