Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 9316 for jurors.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 9316 for jurors.
[PDF]
NOTICE
strikes to remove prospective non-white jurors. Batson held that a defendant’s right to an impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49337 - 2014-09-15
strikes to remove prospective non-white jurors. Batson held that a defendant’s right to an impartial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=49337 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
jurors. Batson held that a defendant’s right to an impartial jury is violated when a venireperson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49337 - 2010-04-26
jurors. Batson held that a defendant’s right to an impartial jury is violated when a venireperson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49337 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
City of La Crosse v. Brian H. Hoff
informed the jury that the verdict must be agreed to by five-sixths or more of the jurors. It also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5533 - 2017-09-19
informed the jury that the verdict must be agreed to by five-sixths or more of the jurors. It also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5533 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Peggy Allison Broadhead v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Farm claims the trial court erred when it refused to permit a former juror in the case to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12289 - 2017-09-21
Farm claims the trial court erred when it refused to permit a former juror in the case to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12289 - 2017-09-21
Peggy Allison Broadhead v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Farm’s insured. State Farm claims the trial court erred when it refused to permit a former juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12289 - 2005-03-31
Farm’s insured. State Farm claims the trial court erred when it refused to permit a former juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12289 - 2005-03-31
Dee Van Ruyven v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
, with jurors Jeff Flashinski and George Dorn dissenting: $266.71 for past wage loss with no dissenters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18219 - 2005-05-18
, with jurors Jeff Flashinski and George Dorn dissenting: $266.71 for past wage loss with no dissenters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18219 - 2005-05-18
State v. Floyd P.
attorney. During voir dire, the juror was asked if he knew any of the parties and he replied that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15725 - 2005-03-31
attorney. During voir dire, the juror was asked if he knew any of the parties and he replied that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15725 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Zena H.
discretion in striking a member of the jury pool who knew his attorney. During voir dire, the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21
discretion in striking a member of the jury pool who knew his attorney. During voir dire, the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15743 - 2017-09-21
State v. Zena H.
attorney. During voir dire, the juror was asked if he knew any of the parties and he replied that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15743 - 2005-03-31
attorney. During voir dire, the juror was asked if he knew any of the parties and he replied that he knew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15743 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Floyd P.
discretion in striking a member of the jury pool who knew his attorney. During voir dire, the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15725 - 2017-09-21
discretion in striking a member of the jury pool who knew his attorney. During voir dire, the juror
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15725 - 2017-09-21