Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1071 - 1080 of 3429 for y's.

COURT OF APPEALS
is not “reasonabl[y] related to the seriousness of the alleged offense” in light of his prior service record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=57413 - 2010-12-06

State v. Rueben Gantt
or intended or because X is included in Z that Y is necessarily excluded." We do not read either Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9642 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI App 19
12-27-2006 Affirmed 2006AP000971 Estate of William Y. Radley, Sr. v. Sandra Ives1
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28112 - 2007-03-11

COURT OF APPEALS
was typical of schoolyard altercations and some of which “went beyond what is … juvenile behavior.” [Y]ou went
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48538 - 2010-03-30

[PDF] State v. Keith Jones
asked Jones, “[W]hat do you want me to do shoot him?” and Jones answered, “[Y]eah, shoot [him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14140 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
court reasoned that: [Y]ou don’t break into a car unless you have something hard and potentially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27127 - 2014-09-15

State v. Bee Bus Line
bargaining agreement. Third, [the] contract must “specif[y] a regular rate of pay” for hours up to forty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11078 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mary K.
parented, has taken on that responsibility, and how the parent has done with that responsibilit[y
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18074 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Neal D. Loehrke v. Matt Praxmarer
that Praxmarer told him “[y]ou need to do what we have to do.” Praxmarer, conversely, testified that Loehrke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25624 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
by the government attorney as “voluntar[y],” “timely,” and “significant and useful”). No. 2015AP717-CR 7
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158625 - 2017-09-21