Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10701 - 10710 of 17547 for ex.

State v. Robert Taylor
A claim of ineffective assistance presents a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2291 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
as a matter of law. See Estate of Sheppard ex rel. McMorrow v. Schleis, 2010 WI 32, ¶15, 324 Wis. 2d 41
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212288 - 2018-05-09

COURT OF APPEALS
in the police reports that Montgomery claimed to not know at the time of his plea. See State ex rel. Rothering
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39849 - 2009-08-24

[PDF] CA Blank Order
. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 97
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103623 - 2017-09-21

2009 WI APP 26
of § 971.19(12) is unambiguous. See State ex rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County, 2004 WI 58, ¶¶45-46
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35219 - 2009-02-23

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
appeal of that conviction and a single opportunity to raise claims of error ….” State ex rel. Macemon v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28379 - 2007-03-12

State v. Wameng Vang
); State ex rel. White v. Gray, 57 Wis. 2d 17, 21, 203 N.W.2d 638 (1973). As an important phase
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5519 - 2005-03-31

State v. Ricky A. Bright
is that Bright has abandoned his trial court claims. The State cites to State ex rel. Peckham v. Krenke, 229 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15963 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
for failing to raise No. 2013AP1639 4 them. See State ex rel. Rothering v. McCaughtry, 205 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121638 - 2014-09-16

[PDF] State v. Dennis Rude
ineffective assistance of counsel is a mixed question of law and fact. State ex rel. Flores v. State, 183
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9835 - 2017-09-19