Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10701 - 10710 of 40290 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 10701 - 10710 of 40290 for probate forms/1000.
State v. Eric S. Fenz
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4014 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael Bartz
the possibility that his probation was going to be revoked and he could face six years in prison. Bartz told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
the possibility that his probation was going to be revoked and he could face six years in prison. Bartz told
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9572 - 2005-03-31
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
The jury convicted Fulani, and the trial court placed him on probation. Fulani refused to cooperate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
The jury convicted Fulani, and the trial court placed him on probation. Fulani refused to cooperate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eric S. Fenz
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4012 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
on concurrent periods of probation. Postconviction/appellate counsel was appointed and filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144414 - 2015-07-09
on concurrent periods of probation. Postconviction/appellate counsel was appointed and filed a no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144414 - 2015-07-09
[PDF]
State v. Joseph A. Weiss
imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime for which the defendant was convicted, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21
imposing sentence or ordering probation for any crime for which the defendant was convicted, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13402 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
—recklessly causing harm. A jury found Williams guilty. The court ordered three years’ probation on each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
—recklessly causing harm. A jury found Williams guilty. The court ordered three years’ probation on each
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134595 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brook Grzelak
.” The Court in Carchman held that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
.” The Court in Carchman held that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12501 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Eric Davis
burglary charge, and placed Davis on probation for ten years, with one year in jail with Huber privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13594 - 2017-09-21
burglary charge, and placed Davis on probation for ten years, with one year in jail with Huber privileges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13594 - 2017-09-21
State v. Louis Elizondo, Jr.
consecutive three-month county jail sentences, and placing him on probation for two years on the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31
consecutive three-month county jail sentences, and placing him on probation for two years on the condition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10169 - 2005-03-31