Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10711 - 10720 of 58524 for o j.
Search results 10711 - 10720 of 58524 for o j.
COURT OF APPEALS
In a harassment injunction, “[o]nly the acts or conduct which are proven at trial and form the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
In a harassment injunction, “[o]nly the acts or conduct which are proven at trial and form the basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29171 - 2007-05-23
COURT OF APPEALS
on November 1, 2006, he “spoke [t]o the Court’s assistant regarding the status of the Court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
on November 1, 2006, he “spoke [t]o the Court’s assistant regarding the status of the Court’s determination
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31307 - 2007-12-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the note and mortgage or that they defaulted. No. 2013AP2489 5 ¶10 “[T]o have standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113395 - 2017-09-21
the note and mortgage or that they defaulted. No. 2013AP2489 5 ¶10 “[T]o have standing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113395 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
: Richard O. Wright, Judge. Affirmed. Before Dykman, P.J., Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49414 - 2010-04-28
State v. Vernon H. Walker
] The September 30, 1996 docket entry is, “[o]n stipulation of counsel, Court adjourn[]s Jury Trial.”
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2005-03-31
] The September 30, 1996 docket entry is, “[o]n stipulation of counsel, Court adjourn[]s Jury Trial.”
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25837 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that “privates” meant where she went “[t]o the bathroom,” and that he touched her where she went “[p]ee.” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2013-06-17
that “privates” meant where she went “[t]o the bathroom,” and that he touched her where she went “[p]ee.” She
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74295 - 2013-06-17
State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
and predict what’s going to happen in the future,” including that “Mr. Lozan[o] is never going to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-11
and predict what’s going to happen in the future,” including that “Mr. Lozan[o] is never going to do
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-11
Leonard L. Jones v. State
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
. …. THE DEFENDANT: Okay…. [D]o you know what 961.55 says? [THE OFFICER]: Exactly, no. THE DEFENDANT: You didn’t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13259 - 2005-03-31
State v. Todd D. Dagnall
COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Patrick J. Fiedler JUSTICES: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17436 - 2005-03-31
COUNTY: Dane JUDGE: Patrick J. Fiedler JUSTICES: Concurred
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17436 - 2005-03-31
Frontsheet
2008 WI 99 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP818 Complete Title: J. G
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15
2008 WI 99 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2006AP818 Complete Title: J. G
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33435 - 2008-07-15