Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 30196 for consulta de causas.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 30196 for consulta de causas.
CA Blank Order
was deficient and prejudicial to the defense is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Discussion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
was deficient and prejudicial to the defense is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. Discussion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94476 - 2013-03-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If Dutton proves a new factor exists, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143668 - 2017-09-21
is a question of law we review de novo. Id. If Dutton proves a new factor exists, the circuit court makes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143668 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unless clearly erroneous, however the application of the facts to the law is reviewed de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162218 - 2017-09-21
unless clearly erroneous, however the application of the facts to the law is reviewed de novo. State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162218 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
de novo. See Schmidt, 277 Wis. 2d 561, ¶13. ¶4 Here, Kasinski contends that the facts show he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
de novo. See Schmidt, 277 Wis. 2d 561, ¶13. ¶4 Here, Kasinski contends that the facts show he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31609 - 2009-09-13
[PDF]
State v. Donnis J.
. It therefore presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13781 - 2014-09-15
. It therefore presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Ball v. District No. 4, Area Bd., 117
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13781 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
, and the constitutionality of the sanitary ordinance. These are all questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16098 - 2017-09-21
, and the constitutionality of the sanitary ordinance. These are all questions of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16098 - 2017-09-21
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis. 2d 379, 386, 521 N.W.2d 152 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis. 2d 379, 386, 521 N.W.2d 152 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 25, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
relief can be granted “tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint,” and is therefore reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27898 - 2007-01-24
relief can be granted “tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint,” and is therefore reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27898 - 2007-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Craig A. Zempel
. ANALYSIS The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State v. Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14285 - 2014-09-15
. ANALYSIS The sufficiency of a complaint is a matter of law that we review de novo. See State v. Adams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14285 - 2014-09-15
2007 WI APP 113
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26
requires that we interpret Wis. Stat. § 973.155(1)(b), a question of law that we review de novo. See State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28262 - 2007-04-26