Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 30177 for de.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 30177 for de.
State v. Charlene Cortes
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3221 - 2005-03-31
a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d at 310
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3221 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James D. Luedtke v. David H. Schwarz
Moreover, “certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
Moreover, “certiorari is not a de novo review.” Van Ermen v. DHSS, 84 Wis.2d 57, 64, 267 N.W.2d 17, 20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10070 - 2017-09-19
Bank One v. Linda L. Harris
that was published. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. DILHR, 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9147 - 2005-03-31
that was published. This is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. DILHR, 90
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9147 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
is a legal question that we review de novo. State v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 309-10, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72650 - 2011-10-25
[PDF]
Janice Mack v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services
Wis.2d 256, 263, 456 N.W.2d 162, 165 (Ct. App. 1990). We review statutory construction questions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15228 - 2017-09-21
Wis.2d 256, 263, 456 N.W.2d 162, 165 (Ct. App. 1990). We review statutory construction questions de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15228 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213314 - 2018-05-22
. This is a question of law that we review de novo. If the motion raises such facts, the [trial] court must hold
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213314 - 2018-05-22
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
erroneous,” while the court’s determination of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244858 - 2019-08-05
erroneous,” while the court’s determination of constitutional fact is reviewed de novo. Id. The record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=244858 - 2019-08-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that we review de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. No. 2024AP1560-CR 4 Sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
that we review de novo. Stewart, 291 Wis. 2d 480, ¶12. No. 2024AP1560-CR 4 Sentencing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1017721 - 2025-10-01
Jill Winnega v. North Central Health Protection Plan
of the insurance policy and therefore entails a de novo review. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis.2d 105, 115, 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
of the insurance policy and therefore entails a de novo review. See Lambert v. Wrensch, 135 Wis.2d 105, 115, 399
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13648 - 2005-03-31
State v. Corey Lee Fondon
. Stat. § 971.12(1), which is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hamm, 146 Wis. 2d 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5098 - 2005-03-31
. Stat. § 971.12(1), which is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Hamm, 146 Wis. 2d 130
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5098 - 2005-03-31