Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 63681 for records.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 63681 for records.
COURT OF APPEALS
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
this obligation “when the record of the sentencing hearing demonstrates that the court actually considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36015 - 2009-03-30
[PDF]
Susan Bauer v. Dawn Willison
of the DeForest municipal court to “forward the record for appeal” to the circuit court. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14378 - 2014-09-15
of the DeForest municipal court to “forward the record for appeal” to the circuit court. The circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14378 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119179 - 2014-09-15
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119179 - 2014-09-15
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2013-10-28
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15872 - 2013-10-28
State v. Steven J. Zack
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2013-10-28
Zack. Because the records show that the trial court reasonably exercised its sentencing discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15873 - 2013-10-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
State v. Joseph C. Reinsbach
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
indicated that he understood and agreed to the proceedings. On the record, the court reinstated the two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9468 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
that the record shows a stipulated payment plan, he was never a party to it and never authorized an attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=108576 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2450-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137409 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2450-CRNM 2 independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=137409 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141619 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=141619 - 2017-09-21