Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10721 - 10730 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Sandra L. Wojtasiak v. Podiatry Associates
not negligent. The Wojtasiaks contend that the trial court erred when it (1) admitted expert testimony from Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4301 - 2005-03-31
not negligent. The Wojtasiaks contend that the trial court erred when it (1) admitted expert testimony from Dr
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4301 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Andres Godina
for relief. Godina argues that the trial court erred by using the amount of sentence credit to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21
for relief. Godina argues that the trial court erred by using the amount of sentence credit to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13093 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, a “negligent/reckless private nuisance.”2 The parties appeared for a bench trial on Lander’s nuisance claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
, a “negligent/reckless private nuisance.”2 The parties appeared for a bench trial on Lander’s nuisance claims
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139882 - 2017-09-21
State v. Toran D. Brooks
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
-degree intentional homicide. Brooks claims that the trial court should have granted his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13635 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herbert W. McGee
§§ 941.30(1) and No. 97-0769-CR 2 939.05, STATS. McGee also appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12222 - 2017-09-21
§§ 941.30(1) and No. 97-0769-CR 2 939.05, STATS. McGee also appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12222 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. The trial court imposed a seventeen-year sentence, comprised of twelve- and five-year respective periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39274 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court imposed a seventeen-year sentence, comprised of twelve- and five-year respective periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39274 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Hazel I. Wright v. Walmart Stores, Inc.
place statute.1 The plaintiffs, Hazel and Steven Wright, claim the trial court erred first when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12404 - 2017-09-21
place statute.1 The plaintiffs, Hazel and Steven Wright, claim the trial court erred first when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12404 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
weapon. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
weapon. He also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30812 - 2007-11-13
State v. Thomas Guzman
. In light of Diana R.'s recantation, the prosecutor wrote to the trial court and defense counsel, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9749 - 2005-03-31
. In light of Diana R.'s recantation, the prosecutor wrote to the trial court and defense counsel, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9749 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kenneth W. Mickelson
regarding evidence of intoxication or impaired ability to operate a motor vehicle; and (3) a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2870 - 2005-03-31
regarding evidence of intoxication or impaired ability to operate a motor vehicle; and (3) a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2870 - 2005-03-31