Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10731 - 10740 of 30175 for de.
Search results 10731 - 10740 of 30175 for de.
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis. 2d 379, 386, 521 N.W.2d 152 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
that this court reviews de novo. See Bahr v. State Inv. Bd., 186 Wis. 2d 379, 386, 521 N.W.2d 152 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15760 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades, 324 Wis. 2d 180, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108450 - 2014-02-26
judgment de novo, employing the same methodology as the circuit court. Palisades, 324 Wis. 2d 180, ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108450 - 2014-02-26
Steven C. Deiss v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
not apply. We disagree. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15447 - 2005-03-31
not apply. We disagree. We review a summary judgment de novo, applying the same standards as the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15447 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin D.K.
a party has met the required burden of proof, is a question of law, which the appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3990 - 2005-03-31
a party has met the required burden of proof, is a question of law, which the appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3990 - 2005-03-31
Village of Jackson v. Richard P. Hamann, Jr.
to the circuit court and sought and received a trial de novo. In that forum, Hamann brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11194 - 2005-03-31
to the circuit court and sought and received a trial de novo. In that forum, Hamann brought a motion to dismiss
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11194 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, and Verhasselt now appeals. Standards of Review ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
, and Verhasselt now appeals. Standards of Review ¶4 We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145389 - 2015-07-30
State v. Karen A.O.
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9933 - 2005-03-31
. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Waupaca County: JOHN A. DES JARDINS, Judge. Reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9933 - 2005-03-31
Grubb Stake Properties, III, LLC v. Silver Bullet Management Corporation,
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25787 - 2006-07-04
summary judgments de novo, using the same methodology as the circuit court. Green Spring Farms v. Kersten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25787 - 2006-07-04
[PDF]
Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
) is a matter of statutory interpretation, and thus is a question of law that this court reviews de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15265 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶8 Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43565 - 2014-09-15
. ¶8 Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43565 - 2014-09-15