Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10741 - 10750 of 19108 for citi.

Kayleigh M. Nagel v. Green Bay Area Public School District
, judicial or quasi-judicial” are synonymous with the term “discretionary.” Envirologix Corp. v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24789 - 2006-04-10

[PDF] State v. Kyle J. Nelson
the judgment. BACKGROUND ¶2 On February 15, 2004, City of Durand police officer Luis Lopes- Serrao
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18180 - 2017-09-21

State v. Charles Patterson
and unambiguous, we go no further; we simply apply the statute to the facts of the case. Cary v. City of Madison
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15488 - 2005-03-31

State v. Boyd W. Pigman
to the seizure); accord City of Bismarck v. Hoffner, 379 N.W.2d 797, 799 (N.D. 1985) (procedural requirements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
burden of proof had been met. City of Milwaukee v. Wilson, 96 Wis. 2d 11, 21, 291 N.W.2d 452 (1980
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87060 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] County of Burnett v. Daniel F. Kaye
chooses its terms carefully and with precision to express its meaning. See Johnson v. City of Edgerton
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16098 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Kenneth J. Seely
discretion. Gonzalez v. City of Franklin, 137 Wis. 2d 109, 139, 403 N.W.2d 747 (1987). The term
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3382 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Brown County v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission
independently. City of Madison v. WERC, 2003 WI 52, ¶12, 261 Wis. 2d 423, 662 N.W.2d 318. There is a “broad
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5938 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Sowle
). It is not necessary for an actual disturbance to have resulted from the conduct. See City of Oak Creek v. King
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14141 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
and an opportunity to be heard.” Northbrook Wis., LLC v. City of Niagara, 2014 WI App 22, ¶21, 352 Wis. 2d 657
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=771849 - 2024-03-05