Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10741 - 10750 of 24459 for extending.

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - October 2014
while he was on extended supervision for another offense. The circuit court accepted his plea
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122327 - 2014-09-22

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of extended supervision; count two—seven years divided as four years of initial confinement and three years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=414602 - 2021-08-24

[PDF] Wisconsin Label Corporation v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance Company
that the Policy did not extend coverage because no “property damage” had occurred under either part
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17354 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
to extend deadlines to file a postjudgment motion or (continued) No. 2020AP1908 6 DISCUSSION
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=426295 - 2021-09-16

COURT OF APPEALS
was taken into custody on March 28, 2010, and revoked on his extended supervision for twelve violations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109215 - 2014-03-13

Beloit Liquidating Trust v. Jeffrey T. Grade
Creditors of Beloit Corporation (Committee) could use § 108(a) to extend the statute of limitations for its
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16655 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
decisions of the circuit court: one to extend K.E.K.’s involuntary commitment and the other requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247564 - 2020-11-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
”) appeals within thirty days after the filing of the reply brief. We may extend that deadline pursuant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109215 - 2017-09-21

Wisconsin Label Corporation v. Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance Company
determined that the Policy did not extend coverage because no “property damage” had occurred under either
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17354 - 2005-03-31

Aurora Medical Group v. Department of Workforce Development
-empted insofar as the law extended beyond the scope of what Congress indicated by way of Title VII
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17406 - 2005-03-31