Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10761 - 10770 of 63539 for records.
Search results 10761 - 10770 of 63539 for records.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189654 - 2017-09-21
to the no-merit report and has not responded. Upon an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189654 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240730 - 2019-05-13
review of the records, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240730 - 2019-05-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19
, but has not filed a response. Upon independently reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=752010 - 2024-01-19
COURT OF APPEALS
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
809.32 (2005-06),[1] so long as the procedures were in fact followed and the record demonstrates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31746 - 2008-02-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=865575 - 2024-10-22
COURT OF APPEALS
denying his motion to supplement the record of that proceeding. We affirm. ¶2 A corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
denying his motion to supplement the record of that proceeding. We affirm. ¶2 A corrections
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29162 - 2007-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
was advised of his right to file a response and has not responded. After reviewing the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914223 - 2025-02-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632667 - 2023-03-15
of the Record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed because there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=632667 - 2023-03-15
CA Blank Order
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120486 - 2014-09-02
the record and counsel’s report, we conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120486 - 2014-09-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15
(“OWI”) from his record. For the reasons which follow, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On October 14
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70217 - 2014-09-15