Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10781 - 10790 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 10781 - 10790 of 66014 for motion to dismiss.
Frank T. White v. Richard Raemisch
judgment order dismissing his civil rights action against two Dane County deputy sheriffs. He says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
judgment order dismissing his civil rights action against two Dane County deputy sheriffs. He says
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15778 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
postconviction motion to withdraw his no contest pleas in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102416 - 2013-09-30
[PDF]
L.A. Willenson v. Luella Bailey
moved the trial court for fees. The trial court dismissed the motion for fees on its merits under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8193 - 2017-09-19
moved the trial court for fees. The trial court dismissed the motion for fees on its merits under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8193 - 2017-09-19
Christopher J. Keller v. James R. Kraft
from an order denying their motion seeking summary judgment.[1] Kraft and the City claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17650 - 2005-05-24
from an order denying their motion seeking summary judgment.[1] Kraft and the City claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17650 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
Christopher J. Keller v. James R. Kraft
. James R. Kraft and the City of Milwaukee appeal from an order denying their motion seeking summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17650 - 2017-09-21
. James R. Kraft and the City of Milwaukee appeal from an order denying their motion seeking summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17650 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
failed to file a brief and the appeal was dismissed. In 2002, Gursky again filed a motion under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185260 - 2017-09-21
failed to file a brief and the appeal was dismissed. In 2002, Gursky again filed a motion under WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Matthew Belton
appeal was dismissed. ¶7 On September 15, 2004, Belton filed another postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24981 - 2017-09-21
appeal was dismissed. ¶7 On September 15, 2004, Belton filed another postconviction motion seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24981 - 2017-09-21
State v. Matthew Belton
)[1] motion. He claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that Belton was not improperly charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24981 - 2006-05-08
)[1] motion. He claims: (1) the trial court erred in ruling that Belton was not improperly charged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24981 - 2006-05-08
[PDF]
WI App 37
). ¶11 The DOJ filed a motion to dismiss the complaints, and the three cases were consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189828 - 2018-02-13
). ¶11 The DOJ filed a motion to dismiss the complaints, and the three cases were consolidated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189828 - 2018-02-13
Frontsheet
to dismiss Jay's appeals related to: (1) Jay's contention that the evidence at trial established oppression
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68027 - 2011-07-31
to dismiss Jay's appeals related to: (1) Jay's contention that the evidence at trial established oppression
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=68027 - 2011-07-31