Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10791 - 10800 of 68517 for did.

[PDF] State v. Maurice L. Floyd
. No. 04-0854-CR 4 had started the fire, though he did not know how. Floyd said he had kicked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7419 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and requested a three-month redemption period. Matson did not file a responsive pleading. Arch Bay moved
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109209 - 2017-09-21

Kathleen Krejci v. John Krejci
potential interest she might obtain in the resort due to her marriage to John. The parties did not exchange
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5994 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to contact her again, which he did. She testified that in the second telephone conversation, she asked
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36404 - 2009-05-12

State v. Julian Lopez
. Lopez alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective when the lawyer did not discuss the lesser-included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6675 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey S. Kimbrough
is of limited intelligence, (2) there is police testimony that he did not comprehend that his conduct posed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2892 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
), pursuant to a “Convertible Promissory Note.” Pursuant did not repay the Note when due. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26696 - 2006-11-07

COURT OF APPEALS
in full for his interest and asking to be dismissed. It is unclear whether he was dismissed, but he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59342 - 2011-01-26

[PDF] State v. James F.R., Jr.
was not adequately informed of his rights because he did not understand them and, thus, he could not possibly have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13517 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. David L. Harmon
lacked subject matter jurisdiction over his trial because the trial court did not make a finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15100 - 2017-09-21