Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1081 - 1090 of 3809 for dollar.
Search results 1081 - 1090 of 3809 for dollar.
Daniel A. Ladwig v. Cheryl Ladwig
five hundred dollars ($500) per month or thirty percent (30%) of each net dollar he earned in excess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8951 - 2005-03-31
five hundred dollars ($500) per month or thirty percent (30%) of each net dollar he earned in excess
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8951 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Daniel A. Ladwig v. Cheryl Ladwig
would pay five hundred dollars ($500) per month or thirty percent (30%) of each net dollar he earned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8951 - 2017-09-19
would pay five hundred dollars ($500) per month or thirty percent (30%) of each net dollar he earned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8951 - 2017-09-19
Terry L. Benn v. James H. Benn
of 1998. The court found that James did have a reduction in earnings of seven to ten thousand dollars per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14631 - 2005-03-31
of 1998. The court found that James did have a reduction in earnings of seven to ten thousand dollars per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14631 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
between six and eight thousand dollars. Bennett claimed that he has never provided an estimate of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
between six and eight thousand dollars. Bennett claimed that he has never provided an estimate of how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28962 - 2014-09-15
Barbara Doyle v. Ronald A. Arthur
of “nominal damages”—in that case one dollar—can sustain an award of punitive damages. And, in Jacque
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
of “nominal damages”—in that case one dollar—can sustain an award of punitive damages. And, in Jacque
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13276 - 2005-03-31
State v. James P. Henderson
Jennings to fix his truck. At trial, Henderson testified that he paid Jennings seventy dollars in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
Jennings to fix his truck. At trial, Henderson testified that he paid Jennings seventy dollars in advance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2249 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 100
by the total number of DUE units located within its geographic boundaries to arrive at a dollar amount per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154769 - 2017-09-21
by the total number of DUE units located within its geographic boundaries to arrive at a dollar amount per
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=154769 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
noted, “That appraisal does not per se justify a $6.6 million dollar assessment … but it does call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
noted, “That appraisal does not per se justify a $6.6 million dollar assessment … but it does call
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93008 - 2013-02-18
COURT OF APPEALS
conversation,” Bennett represented that the work would cost between six and eight thousand dollars. Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26
conversation,” Bennett represented that the work would cost between six and eight thousand dollars. Bennett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28962 - 2007-06-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
… $5,087,500.” The court noted, “That appraisal does not per se justify a $6.6 million dollar assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93008 - 2014-09-15
… $5,087,500.” The court noted, “That appraisal does not per se justify a $6.6 million dollar assessment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93008 - 2014-09-15