Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1081 - 1090 of 2641 for hills.

State v. Glen Joyner
not have pleaded guilty. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59-60 (1985). ¶6
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2414 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Scott Brunson v. Robert L. Ward
by Rick E. Hills, Michelle M. Stoeck and Hills & Hicks, S.C., Brookfield, and oral argument by Rick E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17456 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] NOTICE
and land to Indian Hills Properties, LLC, for $779,160 and the disbursements made from the net proceeds
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=55400 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Scott Brunson v. Robert L. Ward
by Rick E. Hills, Michelle M. Stoeck and Hills & Hicks, S.C., Brookfield, and oral argument by Rick E
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17444 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
to (1) his transfer of assets, including the November 1995 sale of a residence and land to Indian Hills
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55400 - 2010-10-12

[PDF] Expert Report of Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere (Attachment to Lisa Hunter Brief)
); for the Bethune-Hill plaintiffs in Bethune-Hill v. Virginia State Board of Elections in the U.S. District Court
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/expertrepansolabehere.pdf - 2021-12-15

[PDF] State v. Glen Joyner
succeeded at trial and therefore would not have pleaded guilty. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59-60
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2414 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] AP002288 State v. Steven A. Avery
2020AP001610 Katherine Baumel v. Society Insurance 2020AP001628 Ramsey Hill Exploration, LLC v. Sand
/ca/unpub/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478779 - 2022-01-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
on going to trial. See Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 59 (1985). ¶5 “A hearing on a postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=336533 - 2021-02-23

State v. Darren E. Brookins
would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial.” Id. at 312 (quoting Hill v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20585 - 2005-12-12