Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 50148 for our.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 50148 for our.
COURT OF APPEALS
Wis. 2d 615, 579 N.W.2d 698 (1998). Our review is limited to four issues: “(1) whether the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32356 - 2008-04-17
Wis. 2d 615, 579 N.W.2d 698 (1998). Our review is limited to four issues: “(1) whether the agency
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32356 - 2008-04-17
[PDF]
WI APP 113
Enterprise’s dismissal. ¶4 Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33052 - 2014-09-15
Enterprise’s dismissal. ¶4 Our review of a grant of summary judgment is de novo. Summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33052 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
reflect that Mr. Grant’s hands were shaking.” We cannot say from our own review of the video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076289 - 2026-02-11
reflect that Mr. Grant’s hands were shaking.” We cannot say from our own review of the video
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1076289 - 2026-02-11
Certification
. We did so based on our determination that, when read together, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(13)(a), (1r
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2005-03-31
. We did so based on our determination that, when read together, Wis. Stat. § 973.20(13)(a), (1r
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
supervision. Roberts appeals. No. 2022AP1228-CR 4 Discussion ¶10 On our review of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728689 - 2023-11-16
supervision. Roberts appeals. No. 2022AP1228-CR 4 Discussion ¶10 On our review of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728689 - 2023-11-16
COURT OF APPEALS
the identification was unduly suggestive. ¶10 Our review of an order granting or denying a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53538 - 2010-08-18
the identification was unduly suggestive. ¶10 Our review of an order granting or denying a motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53538 - 2010-08-18
State v. Brent L. Barber
the jury on misdemeanor criminal trespass. Following our summary of the factual background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11581 - 2005-03-31
the jury on misdemeanor criminal trespass. Following our summary of the factual background of this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11581 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
Our role on certiorari is limited. If, as here, a circuit court takes no new evidence when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50740 - 2009-01-13
Our role on certiorari is limited. If, as here, a circuit court takes no new evidence when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50740 - 2009-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190. Our review of competency also presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898388 - 2025-01-07
. Mikrut, 2004 WI 79, ¶7, 273 Wis. 2d 76, 681 N.W.2d 190. Our review of competency also presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=898388 - 2025-01-07
[PDF]
State v. M. L. J. N. L. - 2021AP001437
, the constitution says what it says and does not say what it does not say, and our job “is to faithfully discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760025 - 2024-02-08
, the constitution says what it says and does not say what it does not say, and our job “is to faithfully discern
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=760025 - 2024-02-08