Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 40679 for probate forms/1000.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 40679 for probate forms/1000.
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count. 2 His probation was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20
Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count. 2 His probation was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4014 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
State v. Sol Coleman, Jr.
that Lou C. was “pretty good in giving head jobs”; and (3) Coleman's statement to his probation officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8083 - 2005-03-31
that Lou C. was “pretty good in giving head jobs”; and (3) Coleman's statement to his probation officer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8083 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. DeVon'tre L. Cottingham
by disclosing to the jury that he was on probation at the time of the crime. We conclude that Cottingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
by disclosing to the jury that he was on probation at the time of the crime. We conclude that Cottingham
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5189 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
”; (2) at the time of sentencing, Sulla had served only one prior term of probation and had four prior
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1063985 - 2026-01-23
State v. Brook Grzelak
that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id. Carchman is not plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
that art. III does not apply to detainers based on probation violations. Id. Carchman is not plainly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12501 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
. A jury found Williams guilty. The court ordered three years’ probation on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134595 - 2015-02-10
. A jury found Williams guilty. The court ordered three years’ probation on each count, to be served
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134595 - 2015-02-10
COURT OF APPEALS
have seen in footnote 1, however, § 939.617(2) permits a lesser sentence or probation if and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73387 - 2011-11-07
have seen in footnote 1, however, § 939.617(2) permits a lesser sentence or probation if and only
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73387 - 2011-11-07
[PDF]
State v. Eric S. Fenz
Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count. 2 His probation was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count. 2 His probation was subsequently
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4012 - 2017-09-20
State v. Eric S. Fenz
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4013 - 2005-03-31
of a sentence and placed Fenz on concurrent four-year probation terms for each count.[2] His probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4013 - 2005-03-31