Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10801 - 10810 of 58340 for speedy trial.
State v. Martin J. Zielinski
and 961.41(1m)(h)3 (2003-04).[1] Zielinski claims the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
and 961.41(1m)(h)3 (2003-04).[1] Zielinski claims the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4770 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Foy
, in violation of §§ 161.41(1)(cm) and 161.49, STATS., and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
, in violation of §§ 161.41(1)(cm) and 161.49, STATS., and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
State v. David A. Foy
denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wade J. Rex
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
not been fully tried. Specifically, Sexton contends that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19
not been fully tried. Specifically, Sexton contends that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4768 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4768 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4774 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4774 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4758 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4758 - 2005-03-31
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4766 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4766 - 2005-03-31