Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10811 - 10820 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10811 - 10820 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4740 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4740 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Rosetta A. Jorenby v. John Heibl
. Heibl contends that the trial court erred because the motion had a reasonable basis in law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9821 - 2017-09-19
. Heibl contends that the trial court erred because the motion had a reasonable basis in law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9821 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI APP 193
agreement on grounds that the trial court had misinformed him as to the elements of the reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29733 - 2014-09-15
agreement on grounds that the trial court had misinformed him as to the elements of the reckless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29733 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 10, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
), pursuant to a “Convertible Promissory Note.” Pursuant did not repay the Note when due. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26696 - 2006-11-07
), pursuant to a “Convertible Promissory Note.” Pursuant did not repay the Note when due. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26696 - 2006-11-07
State v. Martin J. Zielinski
and 961.41(1m)(h)3 (2003-04).[1] Zielinski claims the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
and 961.41(1m)(h)3 (2003-04).[1] Zielinski claims the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4770 - 2005-03-31
yards. The trial court imposed a forfeiture of $153[2] for the violation of each ordinance resulting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4770 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. David A. Foy
, in violation of §§ 161.41(1)(cm) and 161.49, STATS., and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
, in violation of §§ 161.41(1)(cm) and 161.49, STATS., and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10486 - 2017-09-20
State v. David A. Foy
denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
denying his motion for a new trial. He contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10486 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Wade J. Rex
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Bradley W. Sexton
not been fully tried. Specifically, Sexton contends that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19
not been fully tried. Specifically, Sexton contends that (1) the trial court failed to properly instruct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2805 - 2017-09-19