Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10831 - 10840 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10831 - 10840 of 58340 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Wade J. Rex
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
, (2) Whether the trial court erred when ruling that an “automatic admissibility” issue should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5492 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
. Jolene claims that: (1) the trial court’s valuation of Keith’s business was clearly erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26855 - 2006-10-18
. Jolene claims that: (1) the trial court’s valuation of Keith’s business was clearly erroneous because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26855 - 2006-10-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
the valuation of Keith’s business, a maintenance award, and attorney fees. Jolene claims that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26855 - 2014-09-15
the valuation of Keith’s business, a maintenance award, and attorney fees. Jolene claims that: (1) the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26855 - 2014-09-15
State v. George H. Tutor
because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact. Because the theory in question could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact. Because the theory in question could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
(OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
(OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for No. 2013AP2342-CR 2 failing to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for No. 2013AP2342-CR 2 failing to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
for plea withdrawal, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27644 - 2014-09-15
for plea withdrawal, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27644 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Drazen Markovic
that the trial court erred when it determined that there was no ineffective assistance of counsel by either his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
that the trial court erred when it determined that there was no ineffective assistance of counsel by either his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18341 - 2017-09-21
State v. Drazen Markovic
to vacate his no contest pleas to five felonies. Markovic maintains that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
to vacate his no contest pleas to five felonies. Markovic maintains that the trial court erred when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18341 - 2005-05-31
COURT OF APPEALS
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02