Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10841 - 10850 of 58340 for speedy trial.
Search results 10841 - 10850 of 58340 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
[PDF]
Ronald A. Schaefer v. Mark T. Ulinski
argues that the trial court failed to apply the proper standard with respect to corporate fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3639 - 2017-09-19
argues that the trial court failed to apply the proper standard with respect to corporate fiduciary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3639 - 2017-09-19
State v. Willy J. Love
a judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
a judgment, entered after a jury trial, convicting him of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16164 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. Holmes sought to withdraw his pleas based on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125451 - 2014-10-29
. Holmes sought to withdraw his pleas based on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125451 - 2014-10-29
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 4, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27644 - 2007-01-03
, a new trial, or sentence modification. We affirm for the reasons discussed below. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27644 - 2007-01-03
State v. Elijah Arrington
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, for first-degree reckless homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8814 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct while armed, and recklessly endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85724 - 2014-09-15
conduct while armed, and recklessly endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85724 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Karen M. v. Craig P.
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
Karen M. v. Craig P.
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3680 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
2 intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15