Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10861 - 10870 of 64364 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
Search results 10861 - 10870 of 64364 for educator arrested 13th bail hearing "2013-2023".
State v. Susan M. Curtis
)(a).[2] Curtis was convicted as a repeat offender. ¶2 Curtis was arrested based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
)(a).[2] Curtis was convicted as a repeat offender. ¶2 Curtis was arrested based upon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2939 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Judicial Education 2022
Wisconsin Court System Special Programs: One-time in-person education programs are also
/courts/resources/docs/judeducation.pdf - 2022-02-02
Wisconsin Court System Special Programs: One-time in-person education programs are also
/courts/resources/docs/judeducation.pdf - 2022-02-02
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5388 - 2005-03-31
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5388 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5387 - 2005-03-31
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5387 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rayna J. Bauer
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
that Officer Baylog did not have probable cause to arrest her. After hearing testimony from Baylog, the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5389 - 2005-03-31
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
sobriety tests.[1] As a result of those tests, Hallenbeck was placed under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
sobriety tests.[1] As a result of those tests, Hallenbeck was placed under arrest for operating a motor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of Thompson’s suppression motion would lack arguable merit. In his motion, Thompson argued the arresting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162754 - 2017-09-21
of Thompson’s suppression motion would lack arguable merit. In his motion, Thompson argued the arresting
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=162754 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the arresting officer made contact with Thompson, the officer observed signs of intoxication including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98529 - 2014-09-15
the arresting officer made contact with Thompson, the officer observed signs of intoxication including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98529 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Waukesha v. Robert M. Hallenbeck
tests, Hallenbeck was placed under arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
tests, Hallenbeck was placed under arrest for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9876 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
arrest, arguing that the arrest was constitutionally invalid. We conclude the arrest was valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225486 - 2018-10-30
arrest, arguing that the arrest was constitutionally invalid. We conclude the arrest was valid
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=225486 - 2018-10-30