Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10861 - 10870 of 58500 for speedy trial.
Search results 10861 - 10870 of 58500 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for No. 2013AP2342-CR 2 failing to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
on the alleged ineffectiveness of his trial counsel for No. 2013AP2342-CR 2 failing to pursue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125451 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt for willful nonpayment of maintenance to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt for willful nonpayment of maintenance to his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=47434 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2 intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
2 intoxicated (OWI), fourth offense. Austin argues that the trial court erroneously exercised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conduct while armed, and recklessly endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85724 - 2014-09-15
conduct while armed, and recklessly endangering safety by use of a firearm. He argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=85724 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] William S. Roush, Jr., appeals from a trial court order finding him in contempt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47434 - 2010-03-02
State v. George H. Tutor
because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact. Because the theory in question could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact. Because the theory in question could
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3677 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. George H. Tutor
is not susceptible of appellate determination because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3677 - 2017-09-19
is not susceptible of appellate determination because the trial court did not make necessary findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3677 - 2017-09-19
State v. Norman G.K.
that the trial court erred by denying his attempts to introduce additional suppression evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14851 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred by denying his attempts to introduce additional suppression evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14851 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Karen M. v. Craig P.
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
makes many vague, nonspecific arguments in favor of reversing the judgment. Because the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3680 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sandra K.T.
her children and that her children now live with her neighbors. The trial court found that Sandra's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20
her children and that her children now live with her neighbors. The trial court found that Sandra's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10703 - 2017-09-20