Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 17670 for ex.
Search results 10871 - 10880 of 17670 for ex.
State v. Paul S. Matyasz
or a postconviction motion in the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction. State ex rel. Rothering v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6146 - 2005-03-31
or a postconviction motion in the trial court that entered the judgment of conviction. State ex rel. Rothering v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6146 - 2005-03-31
Bernadette Deal v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
State ex rel. Olson v. Litscher, 2000 WI App 61, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 685, 608 N.W.2d 425 (“An issue is moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15643 - 2005-03-31
State ex rel. Olson v. Litscher, 2000 WI App 61, ¶3, 233 Wis. 2d 685, 608 N.W.2d 425 (“An issue is moot
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15643 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 134
it the common, ordinary, and accepted meaning. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33515 - 2014-09-15
it the common, ordinary, and accepted meaning. State ex rel. Kalal v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33515 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
); State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 403 N.W.2d 449 (1987), aff’d, 486
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208833 - 2018-02-21
); State ex rel. McCoy v. Wisconsin Court of Appeals, 137 Wis. 2d 90, 403 N.W.2d 449 (1987), aff’d, 486
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=208833 - 2018-02-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” comports with Wisconsin’s approach for ascertaining the meaning of statutory language. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
” comports with Wisconsin’s approach for ascertaining the meaning of statutory language. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79419 - 2014-09-15
2009 WI APP 91
. ¶9 We begin our analysis with the plain language of Wis. Stat. § 973.09. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36492 - 2009-06-29
. ¶9 We begin our analysis with the plain language of Wis. Stat. § 973.09. See State ex rel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36492 - 2009-06-29
COURT OF APPEALS
State of Wisconsin ex rel. Deborah L. Smalley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62495 - 2011-04-06
State of Wisconsin ex rel. Deborah L. Smalley, Petitioner-Appellant, v. William
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62495 - 2011-04-06
[PDF]
Margaret Smith v. Richard Golde
ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 569, 494 N.W.2d 408 (1993). ¶7 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3931 - 2017-09-20
ex rel. Badke v. Greendale Village Bd., 173 Wis. 2d 553, 569, 494 N.W.2d 408 (1993). ¶7 WISCONSIN
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3931 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Louise M. Firkus
of the testimony without being so incredible that all of it must be rejected ....” State ex rel. Brajdic v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7523 - 2017-09-19
of the testimony without being so incredible that all of it must be rejected ....” State ex rel. Brajdic v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7523 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael W. Worden
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31
a question of law that we review de novo. See State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173 Wis. 2d 222, 225
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2116 - 2005-03-31